[Guest Post] The Use and Abuse of Analysts (poor things)

NB: This is a cross-post from the Buzz Method blog, where it was originally posted in January 2011. Please note that the views expressed within the article do not necessarily reflect those of the IIAR – they are the opinion of Dominic Pannell, founder of Buzz Method Ltd (@buzzmethod). You can find the interview of Quocirca’s founder here: Around Clive Longbottom from Quocirca in 10 questions.

I just stumbled across an extremely useful document that those prolific chaps at Quocirca published back in 2007 (I seem to recall posting a link at the time). It’s packed with great information and spells out how not to treat members of the analyst community – the report “Use and abuse of analysts” might need updating a little and I would like to see it expanded to include other ‘influencers’ (perhaps I will when I have time), but it should certainly be compulsory reading for anyone entering the world of AR.

All of the guidelines set out in the document are broken either by accident or deliberately every day of the week by ICT companies of all sizes and the communications agencies/consultants they employ. Trust me, it’s a fact.

To be fair, sometimes there’s no way round it… after all, rules were made to be broken… but I have known some repeat offenders who think it’s OK to grab a mile when it’s only really fair to take the inch that’s being offered. They tend to end up with mud all over their faces.

PS: IIAR members can find this report on the Huddle extranet, courtesy of Quocirca – link.

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The IIAR> Institute of Influencer & Analyst Relations

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading